What is user involvement? The concept of user involvement is a democratic force against medical tyranny.

Firstly, “user involvement” is a term based on the worthless of the politically correct movement. The term “mental illness” or “mental disorder” was deemed to have a derogative inference to their meaning. So a meaningless effort led to the creation of a meaningless term “service user” to change the words. The meaning of “user” in user involvement is from the meaning of “service user” which basically means “someone who uses psychiatric and mental health care”. Though user involvement is a term used also for real (biological physical) illnesses its roots are specifically in the rebellion against psychiatric and mental health care.

In this blog I’m talking about how much consent matters to care. I’m thinking about what’s important to the individual. I’m talking about the scientific method of course. But I’m talking about what is important to the individual that’s fundamental to care and it’s a “but” because of how tyrannical psychiatric and mental health care is.

Doctors and others who see care in seeing mental illness rule over their victims of care. The user involvement movement was invented and created as a rebellion against coercive tyranny disguised as care, against control and cruelty justified as care.

User involvement means the users of care influence care instead of doctors ruling over their victims of psychiatric and mental health care. User involvement is a force that fights against medical tyranny – it’s one of the hardest battles for the prevail of the fundamentals of democracy and human rights because it’s a fight against tyranny disguised as care, against the tyranny of one of if not the most respected profession. It’s the tyranny of evil harder to begin to want to fight against because it’s the tyranny run by those who get so much automatic trust in them – the privilege of the medical profession is the pervasive faith that they are good and can be trusted to be humane.

It’s a harder tyranny to recognise is tyranny because it’s disguised as care and the minds of the rebels are decreed as mentally ill because they rebel against the standards of psychiatrists, against the sense of acceptable and unacceptable consequences of the medical tyranny of evil run by doctors. The mentality of doctors in the medical specialty of psychiatry has much in common with “it’s proof that you are mentally ill and mentally incompetent because you see wrong and evil in what we want to do to you in the name of care”.

Doctors don’t rely on words and persuasion in the medical speciality of psychiatry. They don’t give a damn about consent or free will or what are wholly unacceptable consequences to their victims of psychiatric and mental health care. They use any method no matter how brutal, evil and cruel it is and with complete disregard for how these brutalities justified as care are refused by the victims of psychiatry and with complete disregard for how their brutalities justified as care makes their victims feel – that’s the proof of the existence of psychiatry and of every single doctor I’ve ever met (and the rest of monsterkind’s sense of care).

It doesn’t matter what their victims refuse, would never choose or consent to, to their choices and actions justified as care. This is a basis for tyranny and ownership, for coercion and control and cruelty being justified as care. It’s most obvious in the purposes of the medicalised laws that have absolutely nothing in common with the protection of the weak because they are in no way based on a basis of empathy but they are extremely coercive than protective. It doesn’t matter what their victims refuse or refuse to be made to feel – that’s the basis of care in the medical specialty of psychiatry and the medicalised laws.

Psychiatric and mental health care used to be only about what are acceptable and unacceptable consequences to the medical tyranny of evil disguised as care – the invention and creation of user involvement began the fight against the medical tyranny of evil disguised as care. The history of psychiatry is the proof that doctors will resort to any method no matter how evil and cruel and sadistic the methods are – the user involvement movement was borne to fight against this evil sense of care and to fight for the prevail of the fundamentals of democracy and human rights when no one else wants these fundamentals fundamental to living free and in safety to exist for the victims of psychiatry. When everyone else believed “it’s not cruelty and tyranny it’s care” the user involvement movement fought for the unacceptable consequences to the weak and victims – a democratic force fighting against tyranny disguised as care. It’s most obvious in the functions and purposes of the medicalised laws throughout the existence of psychiatry that tyrants use any method no matter how cruel and brutal it is and with complete disregard for how much their victims refuse, would never choose or consent to the brutalities the medical tyranny of evil can justify as care. It is a sense of brutality that ignores brutality (the victims would never choose or consent to) in the name of care and ignores what brutalities justified as care makes the victims of psychiatry feel – this prevails even when the medical tyranny of sadists rules over suicidal individuals.

Obviously the victims fear care.

(They deprive me of so much happiness in the name of care and they care so much about brutalising me without mercy or limit and it doesn’t matter if their brutalities justified as care succeeds in making me want to die – to this day this is what sadists call care.)