Neither care nor science exists whenever and wherever psychiatry exists

In the victims of psychiatry you will find the unrecognised victims of abuse and torment and torture. I am abused and tormented and tortured without mercy or limit throughout all this thought and writing. You can only make the choice for sadists and monsters born and bred evil to have power over my life and how I feel. You cannot do anything else. This is not what this blog is about.

This blog is the progress of thinking from thinking about the betterment of the national clinical guidelines for schizophrenia to thinking about many things. There’s so many thoughts that have come into my mind from this project I set myself over a decade ago to better the clinical guidelines for schizophrenia by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. I failed in this project because I could not find sufficient high quality science and research – by high quality I mean what is used to inform clinical guidelines – in psychiatry and mental health research to better their recommendations.

The guidelines recommended a drug called clozapine and this kills 1.5% of victims in the first six months from agranulocytosis. They recommended against non drug treatments and recommended nothing but drug treatment – if my memory serves me right. (There’s just too many memories I never want to remember and too many memories worse than death the monsters who call themselves the human race want to achieve to this tormented soul and suicidal individual and suicidal slave to the proof of the truth about the sadistic nature of human nature – but this is not what this blog is about.)

I do see victims of the schizophrenia label as part of natural diversity not as mentally ill. I’m not going to elaborate much about this here. I will state that I am wholly against the medicalisation of suicidal individuals, feeling suicidal, mental suffering and mental diversity – this medicalisation is pseudoscience and bad science and brutal in the name of care. I am someone who loves the scientific method and I see it bent, ruined, corrupted and broken by doctors in the medical specialty of psychiatry.

(This medicalisation has done so much well to make me so much better off having never been born and only safe dead because I face such an evil, brutal and sadistic sense of care and sense of acceptable suffering, harms and brutalities. I am simply brutalised too much in life by their choices and actions justified as care because instead of good in human nature and a heart to stop them there’s psychiatry and the efforts of doctors to misrepresent feeling suicidal, natural mental suffering and natural mental diversity as the meaningless product of defective brains. )

The basis of psychiatry is about cultural and social prejudices and norms that existed instead of any competency to recognise natural mental suffering and diversity for what it is. It’s a system of something but it’s not a system of care because it’s devoid of the competency to have empathy and understanding for the beings who are victims of psychiatry. The concept of mental illness is the biological model or biomedical model and it is a falsehood as false as there’s no good that’s innate to human nature.

Basically, when mental suffering and mental diversity are prejudiced against so cannot be seen as natural diversity and suffering then doctors spend their time misrepresenting brain differences as brain defects. When it’s recognised as natural diversity and suffering, when it’s not prejudiced against, then brain differences are brain differences associated with natural diversity and natural suffering.

(The serotonin hypothesis is based on misrepresenting brain differences associated with mental suffering as brain defects because of the pre existing prejudices against mental suffering and the lack of competency to have empathy and understanding for the weak who became victims of psychiatry – the suffering could only be understood as unnatural so brain differences are misrepresented as brain defects. It’s the same with other brain differences misrepresented as brain defects by doctors in the medical speciality of psychiatry. I admit I do not understand neurological disorders – I am just talking about the victims of psychiatry.)

Physical suffering is associated with brain differences between those who are suffering and those who are not – these brain differences can as easily be misrepresented as brain defects as doctors do in the medical specialty of psychiatry. Diversity can also have biological differences and brain differences – again, this can be as easily be misrepresented as biological defects like psychiatrists do. The example is the diagnosis of negritude that some doctors came up with centuries ago to misrepresent black skin as the product of an illness – their prejudices led them to misrepresent natural biological differences as defects and proof of an illness called negritude. (Homosexuals, single mothers, frequent masturbators, slaves who kept on running away, promiscuous women – the list of those prejudiced against so were victims of psychiatry is endless. Worst of all it’s suicidal individuals who are victims of psychiatry, we who have the severity of the suffering of suicidal individuals and the awfulness of feeling suicidal ignored and misrepresented as the meaningless symptom of a defective brain.)

I need to make this point to make you see that psychiatry is psuedoscience. This blog is mostly about bad science than the psuedoscience – psuedoscience is obviously bad science but here I’m talking in this blog about a bad implementation of the scientific method beyond the fallacy at the foundation of psychiatry.

I think it’s important to note here that there’s quite a large amount of natural diversity oppressed by the label of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. I will talk about the specificity necessary for the scientific method to work and succeed. I love the scientific method and I see its successes in, for example, the science of chemistry – this quality of science is what I am trying to reach towards. The progress of science has led to the most extraordinary and amazing thing and that is the periodic table of elements – about 120 elements on their own and in combination are responsible for all the solids, liquids and gases in the world and Wikipedia counts 350,000 compounds all made from a combination of the number of elements in the periodic table. I would say that psychiatric science is at the level of chemistry science when alchemy existed but it is more accurate to say that it has more in common with alchemy than chemistry science and I am not alone in this assertion. (The pseudoscientific basis of psychiatry is why it is more like alchemy than chemistry.)